• @Professorozone
    link
    58 days ago

    Did anyone read the article? I didn’t really understand it, the way he phrased it. I mean I’m not defending him or anything. He said a lot of other crap, but in the article it sounded like he was saying uninsured didn’t DESERVE the right to health, but rather didn’t currently(2013) POSSESS the right to health, because they were uninsured. He said that people should be screened for free. Not sure what kind of screening he was talking about but…

    Is that the way you read it?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      16 days ago

      Your interpretation is generous, but let’s go with it. So hospital ERs should deny patients without insurance. Let them die, let babies die, let grandmothers die, all because they are poor. That is what you are saying he was saying.

      And that, my friend, is immoral bullshit. People like that are a plague on society.

      • @Professorozone
        link
        15 days ago

        No I get it. I’m not defending the celebrity medic. I’m just saying that I think the title may have been misleading. But quite seriously I found what he did actually say a bit confusing. That’s all.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      67 days ago

      That’s not the way I read it, but I can see where you’re coming from:

      Give them a way of crawling back out of the abyss of darkness of fear over not having the health they need, and give them an opportunity, cause they don’t have the right to health, but they have the right to access a chance to get that health.

      Comes across as “pull yourself up by your bootstraps” rhetoric to me.