Democrats have a choice: continue as the loyal opposition in a political order defined primarily by the populist right, or mobilize a transformative ideological vision and distinctive set of policies capable of defining the political order itself.
clearly so since there’s no way that framing all constructive criticism as russian bots; chinese useful idiots; and tankie circe jerks could backfire and is absolutely the correct way to “big tent coalition build” your way to an easy election victory over a deeply unpopular racist, sexist, homophobic oligarchically unapologetic candidate.
he’s so unpopular that you could probably also say goulish shit like “genocide can be gentle and justified; just wait” or “it’s sometimes okay to disintegrate refugee/immigrant family” and still win. hell! they’ll probably even start voting for you instead of that other guy if you do say this. lol
clearly so since there’s no way that framing all constructive criticism as russian bots; chinese useful idiots; and tankie circe jerks could backfire and is absolutely the correct way to “big tent coalition build” your way to an easy election victory over a deeply unpopular racist, sexist, homophobic oligarchically unapologetic candidate.
he’s so unpopular that you could probably also say goulish shit like “genocide can be gentle and justified; just wait” or “it’s sometimes okay to disintegrate refugee/immigrant family” and still win. hell! they’ll probably even start voting for you instead of that other guy if you do say this. lol
hate to be the one to break it too you, but that candidate is far from deeply unpopular, it’s just factually not true.