Are there any cheaper options that can be bought on Aliexpress? Since tear gas comes in larger particules, will a P100 do? What about pepper spray?
Are there any cheaper options that can be bought on Aliexpress? Since tear gas comes in larger particules, will a P100 do? What about pepper spray?
Military surplus is a better bet.
You can get full face for like 20-30 with a canister pretty regularly, and you need full face because it fucks up your eyes too.
No idea how you’re gonna test the seal tho, but if you don’t seal it we’ll when you put it on. It’s not gonna do anything. You can cover the hole the canister goes in with you hand and see if any air leaks in, but it’s not the same as actually getting tear gassed and seeing if it works.
In boot camp we had a kid not seal right, and he ended up throwing up inside his mask, then ripping it off flinging vomit all over the place. So even if you have the right equipment, you need to know how to use it.
There seems to be at least one story like that from every chemical training. They’re always gross in the funniest ways
Yeah, a good mask worn wrong just concentrates what gets in and it’s 100x worse.
Out in the open tear gas isn’t a big thing, you just move somewhere like 20 feet away and wait a very short amount of time before moving back.
It would be an issue if police had kettled a group, but by then you’re all fucked already. You need organizers aware of the situation to prevent it in the first place.
People should be organizing and buying radios not gas masks. But situational awareness doesn’t look as punk rock as a gas mask
A good reminder.
A side note on radios - most cheap radios don’t allow for encryption, revealing the speaker’s voice (which is enough to identify a person in these days). Encrypted tactical radios have silly prices however.
A crude way to cover one’s rear end somewhat is using a signal system. One beep = meaning A, two beeps = meaning B. Error-prone and inflexible.
Another way is using Morse code. Slow and raises the barrier for operating a radio, and high barriers will mean a lack of competent operators.
Another crude way is using voice synthesizer to speak (no identifiable voice) and a codeword table to authenticate transmissions against spoofing. This way, everyone can listen to unauthenticated broadcasts and those in need can check the code to authenticate the message.
E.g.
Bobsomeone with a codebook, and anyone downstream from Bob can hearBeyond that - the wonderful world of software.
There’s a lot of Android software out there (Briar comes to my mind immediately) that does various jobs decently. But most Android devices are recycled mobile phones which have a history of use during their “past lives” and can be traced to somewhere. This is a downside. A communications terminal should be clean and have no traceable fingerprint. But maybe that’s a compromise one must be willing to make.
Radio modems that plug into a laptop and have reach comparable to a tactical radio are better in that regard. They reach longer distances than WiFi on phones, cost relatively little (e.g. 20 €). But some are really slow. Sending full-fledged GPG messages over them could turn out somewhat annoying, but in return for annoyance, one would get hard privacy. Alice and Bob could talk of anything they’d like, and the Ecilop would not understand a thing.
Meanwhile, WiFi cards can be used to set up mesh networks. Some WiFi devices have outstanding reach, allow somewhat above-legal transmit power, and can broadcast in inject mode (spoofed MAC addresses, fill 802.11 headers with any info that you like), and listen in monitor mode. With a bit of code, they can even frequency-hop over the spectrum. I’ve seen drone video links implemented this way - quite fast, no problem moving 10 mbit/s to a distance of 2 kilometers (direct line of sight, cheap Chinese panel antennas). But most WiFi devices cannot do monitor and inject, and cannot go beyond 100 meters.