• Flying SquidOP
        link
        154 days ago

        I wonder what he does. As a “working man.”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          13
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Lots of people are able to “save” $10k per year, depending on your definition of savings (for example, putting it into a retirement fund) but anyone who thinks they are well-off because of it don’t realize where they stand on the class ladder. If you continue to stash away that ten grand every year it’ll take you 42 million years to match Elon Musk’s current net worth. That’s so long ago that the Eurasian landmass was still a blob of disconnected islands.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          6
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Plenty of workers can save that money in 5 months. I don’t even think that someone need a high paying job for that, depending on your expenses. Problem is that that money buys you little nowadays.

          What’s that? No even a 1% of an average house anyways.

          • Flying SquidOP
            link
            14 days ago

            See my link about half of Americans living paycheck-to-paycheck and then realize that plenty of the ones that aren’t have stuff they want to spend the remaining money on to make their lives less miserable like entertainment.

            Is it possible? Maybe. Is it healthy for your mental state? Probably not in a lot of the other half of Americans who can afford to save anything at all.

        • gon [he]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          23 days ago

          I’m a PhD researcher. I make just over €1250 a month, grant money. Portugal.

          • Flying SquidOP
            link
            13 days ago

            Sounds like grad students get fucked over everywhere.

            • gon [he]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              23 days ago

              I guess? €1250 is the average national wage here, I think. I’d argue we have low wages as a nation, not so much as grad students, you know what I mean? I’m not upset at my situation, even if it’s not a lot of money.

              • Flying SquidOP
                link
                23 days ago

                Oh, well if you’re fine with it, fair enough. I just feel like, considering what grad students will be doing in the future, they deserve more than average.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          44 days ago

          The only idea that comes to mind is working for the mining industry in Austalia. My cousin’s husband was a carpenter there and apparently made bank. Although from the stories they told me, most would not save a significant portion. Apparently they tend to work 14 days on, 14 days off or in similar arrangements, and be flown in and out around their shifts. A significant portion of their colleagues would choose to fly to Bali instead of their respective Australian cities, spend their 14 days off there and immediately use up their wages. Weird lifestyle overall.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            Very similar situation in western Canada’s oil industry, except replace Bali with drugs and big trucks.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        294 days ago

        there’s always gotta be at least one “let’s all pay attention to how this isn’t a problem for ME” chud in the comments

      • Dwemthy (he/him)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -164 days ago

        Nearly half means not half, so that’s better than 50/50 odds to not be living paycheck to paycheck. That’s not really that lucky, statistically speaking

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          124 days ago

          And there’s a big difference between not living paycheck to paycheck, and being able to save $1k/mo

        • Flying SquidOP
          link
          74 days ago

          How does that not still make the statement in the meme true? Because I think it still does. If you’re not living paycheck-to-paycheck it doesn’t mean you are able to amass $5000 in savings, it means you’re not at risk of going into debt (or at least more debt than you’re probably in thanks to things like student loans).

    • @SpaceNoodle
      link
      234 days ago

      I put that much every month into my savings account.

      See how stupid this contest is?

    • @HappycamperNZ
      link
      114 days ago

      12k a year - gets really depressing when you realize how many years it takes to buy a house, and in America how many years a small medical event costs you.

      • gon [he]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23 days ago

        Yeah, it’s really not much at all… Our government actually recently set up this thing where they’ll cover the cost of a house for young working people, but even then it’s really tough to buy. I don’t want to buy anytime soon, but still, it’s a real struggle for lots of people.

        Sucks on the healthcare in America. Hope you guys get something worked out over there… :C

    • @Jamablaya
      link
      -174 days ago

      IKR? It’s not hard. Whoever posted this without accounting for the inflation since 1950 really just told everyone he has no try in him.

      • Flying SquidOP
        link
        104 days ago

        You’re right. I should have just tried harder to be wealthy but I couldn’t afford to buy the bootstraps to pull myself up with.

        • @Jamablaya
          link
          -104 days ago

          If you think that’s wealthy, that’s just more indication of your mental blocks.

          • Flying SquidOP
            link
            44 days ago

            I think it’s wealthier than half the country. Far more than half, in fact. Because plenty of the people who aren’t living paycheck-to-paycheck still want to do things like go out to eat a couple of times a month or buy the latest games just so their lives aren’t totally miserable, so they aren’t able to save up $5000 either.

            Congratulations on your privilege though.

      • gon [he]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 days ago

        Well, I’m in a very privileged position… For a lot of people it’s not easy at all. Making minimum wage in my country there’s no way you can save that much, for example.

    • @Cypher
      link
      -154 days ago

      The number of people on lemmy who are apparently dirt poor and don’t comprehend money or the economy is ridiculous.

      Anything short of declaring yourself a homeless disabled pensioner eating rats to survive will get hostile responses around here, and even then someone would claim rats are a luxury.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        224 days ago

        No, the downvotes are for being tone-deaf and contributing nothing of value to the conversation. Lots of us here are perfectly able to save that much and more, but that doesn’t change the fact that far too many cannot.

        • gon [he]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          23 days ago

          I’m a young man and I make about the average income in my country. I saved that much very easily in only 5 months. That’s some value to the conversation, I’d say. Not to take away from the discussion of course, and I do apologize for being tone-deaf. I really just meant it as a throwaway comment, I don’t know, didn’t think much about it.

        • @Cypher
          link
          -144 days ago

          Their comment responds directly to the claim in the OP.

          That you lack the reading comprehension to understand this is horrifying.

            • @Cypher
              link
              -84 days ago

              56% of Americans have more than $5000 in savings excluding retirement funds such as 401k.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    3
                    edit-2
                    3 days ago

                    if you simply take the average across the available generations (which is what I did)

                    Bruh

                    1−(.54+.52+.42+.29)/4 = 56%

                    This assumes that there’s the exact same number of people in each generation. There are not. If the above is what you did, then what you’ve calculated is the percentage of generations that have over 5k. Squid is talking about the percentage of people who have over 5k. Those are two different numbers.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    34 days ago

                    Thanks for providing a source, but I’m very skeptical of anybody using averages to represent this rather than the median. If you put 99 destitute and homeless people in a room along with Elon Musk the average net worth in that room is over 4 billion dollars, which to put it mildly does not reflect the reality of most people in the room.

                  • Flying SquidOP
                    link
                    04 days ago

                    Yes. Averages do paint different pictures than actual hard numbers. And yet the actual hard numbers show the reality of the situation, and that reality is that a lot less than 56% Americans have more than $5000 in savings because that has nothing to do with an average.

      • gon [he]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 days ago

        I don’t know about all that…

        I just meant for it to be a factoid I guess, didn’t think much about when I posted. When I saw all the notifications I was actually expecting to see people were as excited about potatoes as I am — I made a post about it last night.

        Lots of people do struggle, I think it’s fair to point out how hard it is to save for some.