Looking to make a change i think.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    13
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    But if the fediverse isn’t actually distributed, then you don’t actually have the option, right? If 80% of activity is on one server, then that server effectively controls the fediverse, and if you have a problem with their admins or moderators, you don’t have a viable alternative.

    If it’s not actually distributed, the fact that it theoretically could be doesn’t really matter. And this isn’t even mentioning the possibility of a centralized server having technical or legal issues.

    The divorce analogy is not a good one because that’s an individual decision, whereas migrating servers and communities is not something that one individual person can just suddenly choose to do. It requires time, effort, and collective action, so it’s better to be pre-emptively distributed to eliminate that vulnerability in the first place.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      34 days ago

      If 80% of activity is on one server, then that server effectively controls the fediverse,

      Is that still true with easy export? It sounds like that server effectively controls the fediverse until it doesn’t.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        14 days ago

        What do you mean by easy export? I haven’t been keeping up with recent Lemmy updates because SJW is still running 0.19.5.

        But if that’s some way to transfer your account to another server, that helps a little bit, but the more difficult thing is to migrate the communities to a new server. AFAIK you would have to start the communities from scratch with 0 posts and 0 subscribers, and that takes a long time to build back up.