• 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I don’t even know why people are surprised… Would they flip out if they heard about OnStar, which was super common to see in most cars made in the mid to late 2000’s/2010’s? They could do the same thing. They GPS track the vehicle, can remotely shut it off, open doors/windows, etc. And I know Teslas advertise this kind of functionality, having worked there and seeing that shit in the dealer at the front of the plant.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      74 days ago

      Would they flip out if they heard about OnStar, which was super common to see in most cars made in the mid to late 2000’s/2010’s?

      You could opt out of OnStar. It was optional.

      Can you opt out of the current car surveillance collective? I don’t think so.

      • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Just because you could choose not to subscribe to the service doesn’t mean the car still can’t be monitored or controlled by them and they very likely still collected data regardless.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          64 days ago

          Unlikely.

          You might be too young to remember this, but privacy used to be a thing people paid attention to, at least moderately, even in the naughties and early tens. If OnStar had been caught deliberately spying on people who specifically rejected their service, it would have been a major scandal.

          Nowadays the new normal is that Big Data does pretty much whatever they want unabated, people pretend to believe their privacy policies, and when tech monopolies are caught red-handed doing shady shit, people shrug and change the channel. But it wasn’t always like that.