• Snot Flickerman
    link
    fedilink
    English
    61
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    The most controversial part of the plan is likely to revolve around the pricing of medical data, which experts have warned will fuel public concern over profiteering from private medical information.

    NO SHIT SHERLOCK. Because it is profiteering from private medical information!


    Unrelated but interesting: Financial Times doesn’t like you copying and pasting text from their site and when you paste copied text, they’ve added something extra there. This is what it looked like when I pasted the small bit of text I copied for the quote:

    Please use the sharing tools found via the share button at the top or side of articles. Copying articles to share with others is a breach of FT.com T&Cs and Copyright Policy. Email [email protected] to buy additional rights. Subscribers may share up to 10 or 20 articles per month using the gift article service. More information can be found at https://www.ft.com/tour.

    https://www.ft.com/content/9ec787a8-60d5-4899-8223-81335dfa919b

    The most controversial part of the plan is likely to revolve around the pricing of medical data, which experts have warned will fuel public concern over profiteering from private medical information.

    Well go fuck yourself, Financial Times, I don’t like people who think it’s okay to slap some shit into my clipboard that I didn’t actually copy. That’s shady fucking shit,hijacking my copy/paste.

    It’s just fucking greed all the way down, isn’t it?

    • @Docus
      link
      English
      105 days ago

      It would be great to have a news community where ft.com links were banned.

      • @wurzelgummidge
        link
        English
        14 days ago

        Yes, also ban Radio Free Asia/Europe and all the other US propaganda networks

        • @FlowVoid
          link
          English
          -44 days ago

          Yes, also ban Jacobin and all the other non-US propaganda networks.