It’s faster and has a different feature set. Also it’s written in Node.js, not PHP, so I can integrate it into my Node.js apps.
Neither of the servers you mentioned can work on a flat file system folder, so managing my Jellyfin media wouldn’t even be possible with either of them.
Neither supports file deduplication, encryption at rest, PAM authentication, or .htpasswd authentication.
Both require a database and can only be managed through their web interfaces.
Both of their web interfaces require modern browsers, so wouldn’t be supported on something like a terminal based browser.
It’s faster and has a different feature set. Also it’s written in Node.js, not PHP, so I can integrate it into my Node.js apps.
Neither of the servers you mentioned can work on a flat file system folder, so managing my Jellyfin media wouldn’t even be possible with either of them.
Neither supports file deduplication, encryption at rest, PAM authentication, or .htpasswd authentication.
Both require a database and can only be managed through their web interfaces.
Both of their web interfaces require modern browsers, so wouldn’t be supported on something like a terminal based browser.
Did you read my post?
It’s faster and has a different feature set. Also it’s written in Node.js, not PHP, so I can integrate it into my Node.js apps.
Neither of the servers you mentioned can work on a flat file system folder, so managing my Jellyfin media wouldn’t even be possible with either of them.
Neither supports file deduplication, encryption at rest, PAM authentication, or .htpasswd authentication.
Both require a database and can only be managed through their web interfaces.
Both of their web interfaces require modern browsers, so wouldn’t be supported on something like a terminal based browser.
And then QuickDAV is not really comparable.
Thanks! That’s sounds great.