So who you rape matters? So if Trump raped what he considers as the worst of the world or someone he considers that deserves it and that it’s unquestionably justified for doing so, that makes it okay?
The conversation is about murder, not rape. The purpose of rape is to personally gain sexual satisfaction, or to hurt someone for the sake of it. That is not the case here, and it’s a false equivalency.
The original question was specifically: people championing a rapist (Trump), people championing a murderer (Luigi)—what’s the difference? Both are championing a great act of terrible violence, both sides just as convinced as the other of its justification; murder is murder, it doesn’t matter if it’s Hitler or yet another CEO to be replaced. Rape is rape, murder is murder, bad is bad—no matter the extent we take oaths to how justified it is for doing so.
From my point of view, it wasn’t. World War 2 was nothing but violence tumbleweeding into more and more. Who can say how many less lives would have been forced into losing if we would’ve been appealing to the people of Germany and the men that make up its army—that have been dooped by Hitlers propaganda for years regarding Jews. Nothing but incessant of the opposite of what the Nazi’s had to offer would have woken them up from all their “oath-taking” so to speak, to stop it from continuing as long as it did.
Congrats, you’ve justified a moral position that would have lead to nazis controlling the world, and exterminating countless more millions of people. What a great moral system you have.
The men that made up the Nazi regime were men, dooped into believing beyond any shadow of a doubt the Jews weren’t. No amount of equal parts hate and evil will ever truly eliminate it. Only our knowledge of love as a species has that ability—of virtue and selflessness. The knowledge of never taking tha oaths we take to ourselves and to other men that lead to any war at all in the first place needs to be gained. And you can’t wake up someone (especially a group of people) who’s been convinced beyond questioning that they need to eliminate you by trying to do the same back. Only the opposite truly has that ability, ultimately.
No it wasn’t. If so, please kindly reply to me with it quoted so I can understand more clearly. Thank you.
So who you rape matters? So if Trump raped what he considers as the worst of the world or someone he considers that deserves it and that it’s unquestionably justified for doing so, that makes it okay?
The conversation is about murder, not rape. The purpose of rape is to personally gain sexual satisfaction, or to hurt someone for the sake of it. That is not the case here, and it’s a false equivalency.
The original question was specifically: people championing a rapist (Trump), people championing a murderer (Luigi)—what’s the difference? Both are championing a great act of terrible violence, both sides just as convinced as the other of its justification; murder is murder, it doesn’t matter if it’s Hitler or yet another CEO to be replaced. Rape is rape, murder is murder, bad is bad—no matter the extent we take oaths to how justified it is for doing so.
Was it morally acceptable for allied soldiers to kill nazis?
From my point of view, it wasn’t. World War 2 was nothing but violence tumbleweeding into more and more. Who can say how many less lives would have been forced into losing if we would’ve been appealing to the people of Germany and the men that make up its army—that have been dooped by Hitlers propaganda for years regarding Jews. Nothing but incessant of the opposite of what the Nazi’s had to offer would have woken them up from all their “oath-taking” so to speak, to stop it from continuing as long as it did.
Congrats, you’ve justified a moral position that would have lead to nazis controlling the world, and exterminating countless more millions of people. What a great moral system you have.
The men that made up the Nazi regime were men, dooped into believing beyond any shadow of a doubt the Jews weren’t. No amount of equal parts hate and evil will ever truly eliminate it. Only our knowledge of love as a species has that ability—of virtue and selflessness. The knowledge of never taking tha oaths we take to ourselves and to other men that lead to any war at all in the first place needs to be gained. And you can’t wake up someone (especially a group of people) who’s been convinced beyond questioning that they need to eliminate you by trying to do the same back. Only the opposite truly has that ability, ultimately.