• @Maggoty
    link
    English
    11 month ago

    Except you’re blaming past congresses who absolutely operated inside their constitutional bounds. That is not the same thing because that would make any effective regulatory scheme impossible and give the courts a pass on their blatant corruption.

    • FaceDeer
      link
      fedilink
      11 month ago

      I’m not “blaming” anyone. I’m describing what’s happening. The reason why it’s happening is irrelevant.

      • @Maggoty
        link
        English
        11 month ago

        Is this you?

        The problem is that it isn’t a law, it’s a regulation.

        … it really is just another example of how various parts of the US government have been ceding or delegating their responsibilities around willy-nilly in ways that weren’t constitutionally intended…

        Because that looks like blame to me, and being just plain wrong.

        • FaceDeer
          link
          fedilink
          01 month ago

          Yes, that’s me, and it’s not blaming. It’s describing the problem. I’m not saying whether these things should be law or regulation or whatever, I’m explaining why these things are being overturned in court.

          I’m really baffled by what the point of this argument is. Are you trying to say that things are working as intended?

          • @Maggoty
            link
            English
            1
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            You are wrong about why. The court is lying. They are abusing their power to benefit their billionaire friends. Congress has the power to make the law, and they did make the law. The judiciary had no problem with that law for 90 years, and now suddenly it’s an issue?