• @Noobnarski
      link
      74 days ago

      And other regulations are written by the lobbyists of big companies.

      Here in Germany we have so many regulations that don’t help anyone, except big companies who can circumvent or deal with them.

      I don’t want to reduce environmental or worker protection, but we need to simplify a lot of regulations so that the time to do the paperwork is reduced, one of the solutions should be good digitalisation.

    • @humorlessrepost
      link
      English
      -5
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Some are, sure. I think most on Lemmy support those kinds. While I enjoy the effects, USB-C mandates aren’t written in blood, and I suspect the majority of regulations are of that variety.

      • Björn Tantau
        link
        fedilink
        184 days ago

        The USB-C mandate is a direct result of it being actively ignored by Apple. The way to universal chargers, first through micro USB and then USB C was also championed by the EU but only as a loose industry agreement or so. Definitely not enough to reign in Apple which is why it was now made mandatory.

        The main motivation was to reduce electronic waste due to every device having a different charger and often not even standardising in the same company.

        • @humorlessrepost
          link
          English
          0
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          I support the mandate. Just pointing out that the whole “blood of victims” thing, while true of some very important regulations, is nonsense for most of them. There were no victims of lightning ports. There was no blood involved in generic Champagne being called Sparkling Wine.