• @[email protected]OP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Replace death with any heavy executive-issued penalty. The point here is the polite-implicit vs the impolite-explicit. (Ok i reworded it)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      73 days ago

      “Hi! Please put all your candy in the bag, or I’ll smash your pumpkins”

      vs.

      “Give me the candy or I’ll smash your pumpkins”

      ?? Is that what you’re asking?

      Is there any backstory to your request?

      • @Postmortal_Pop
        link
        23 days ago

        It’s more like “trick or treat” vs “candy or we egg this joint”.

        The one is social accepted, polite, and doesn’t overtly state an intention to harm but it does imply it. The other is exactly the same, but it’s direct, no implication, just one or the other.

        Another example would be “you gotta pay us for protection, you wouldn’t want anything to happen while you’re here.” Vs. " Pay up or we cut you".

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        No, it’s “please give me your candy” (with the implied threat). Vs “give me your candy or I’ll smash”.

        (Also, I reworded the post because you people are so literal and easily distracted.)

        • @Today
          link
          13 days ago

          Probably the second (unless it’s something as common as trick or treat) as the implication may not hit me until later. You also have to judge the likelihood of follow thru- like when a kid get threatened with forever grounding.

    • @NeoNachtwaechter
      link
      23 days ago

      The point here is the polite-implicit vs the impolite-explicit.

      But there is no politeness in threatening.