@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 1 year agopluto plsmander.xyzimagemessage-square13fedilinkarrow-up1310arrow-down113
arrow-up1297arrow-down1imagepluto plsmander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square13fedilink
minus-square@SkaryonlinkEnglish18•1 year agoFeels like we can agree to disagree on that one but I hope we can all agree that Neil deGrasse Tyson is fucking annoying.
minus-squareKerrigorlinkfedilink6•1 year agoWhile we can disagree on the latter portion, the first sentence is simply fact. The IAU does not provide any guidelines based on quantifiable data for this requirement. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/IAU_definition_of_planet https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clearing_the_neighbourhood
Feels like we can agree to disagree on that one but I hope we can all agree that Neil deGrasse Tyson is fucking annoying.
While we can disagree on the latter portion, the first sentence is simply fact. The IAU does not provide any guidelines based on quantifiable data for this requirement.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/IAU_definition_of_planet
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clearing_the_neighbourhood
I like him.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯