• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1862 days ago

    This article credits Legal Eagle, embeds the original, is much shorter to read than an 8-minute video and doesn’t require me to wear headphones. Lemmy is a text based social media so it makes sense to favour text sources. Definitely better than linking to some overloaded Invidious instance which seems to be the norm.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      142 days ago

      Lemmy is a text based social media

      No it is not. It is a link aggregator. Can be text, can be images, can be video, can be news, etc. etc.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 days ago

        There’s plenty of core social components to Lemmy. It’s a platform for self-organising communities that curate, rank and discuss content. Without that I’d be using RSS reader only.

        • Saik0
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          There’s plenty of core social components to Lemmy.

          Nothing requires the social components of lemmy to be text only though. Many images, gifs, and videos are shared in comment sections as well. Claiming text only or text-based is incorrect when all media types are available in every facet of lemmy.

          Edit: I will add, I do appreciate a text source though… I can get through pages of text faster than I can watch a youtube video at 2x speed. But there are times where the imagery help to clear up some topics as well.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            7
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            It’s a spectrum like most things but to give some extreme examples - Lemmy can work without embedding media files but it can’t work without text. Instagram could work with just video, ability to scroll and a like button.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            If YouTube videos are what “modern journalism” has to offer, modern journalism is trash.

            I have absolutely zero interest in watching an eight minute video to gain what I could have read in two minutes.

            I don’t need to see anybody 's face or hear any stupid music or, even worse, watch them talk over another video as they present the information. 90% of what these people do would be more effective presented textually, and the rest is ads, vamping, and narcissism.

            YouTube is great for spreading misinformation and propaganda, and wasting people’s time. Let’s move on.

            • babybus
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -32 days ago

              You’re so angry lol. Just don’t watch it jeez.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        16
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Exhausting. Like the people who used to yell at us for using straws. Your anger is misplaced at individuals.