• @[email protected]OP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    27
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    We all saw the undeniable evidence that Twitter had suppressed anything not in line with the positions of the left.

    The green line is (at least) the one you need.

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        323 days ago

        We all saw the undeniable evidence that Twitter had suppressed anything not in line with the positions of the left.

        Called out. Posts this:

        Did you mean this… https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2021/oct/22/twitter-admits-bias-in-algorithm-for-rightwing-politicians-and-news-outlets

        But apparently doesn’t read past the headline.

        Home feed promotes rightwing tweets over those from the left, internal research finds

        The research found that in six out of seven countries, apart from Germany, tweets from rightwing politicians received more amplification from the algorithm than those from the left; right-leaning news organisations were more amplified than those on the left; and generally politicians’ tweets were more amplified by an algorithmic timeline than by the chronological timeline.

        According to a 27-page research document, Twitter found a “statistically significant difference favouring the political right wing” in all the countries except Germany. Under the research, a value of 0% meant tweets reached the same number of users on the algorithm-tailored timeline as on its chronological counterpart, whereas a value of 100% meant tweets achieved double the reach. On this basis, the most powerful discrepancy between right and left was in Canada (Liberals 43%; Conservatives 167%), followed by the UK (Labour 112%; Conservatives 176%). Even excluding top government officials, the results were similar, the document said.