Totally off the wall question, which I realize probably isn’t very meaningful, but I was watching a movie where a character was using a suppressed rifle. Looked like an AR/.223 (I assume).
Well it got me thinking - how much can a given gun be suppressed (decibel reduction) before performance is significantly reduced (I assume it must impact performance, even if just a little since it’s attenuating sound waves, which are energy, but what do I know?).
I’m sure it varies by round/load, barrel length, etc, so let’s assume a subsonic .223 round in a 14" barrel (is that a common lenth?). Or if you know a specific case that’s fine too.
Surely there are reasons why a given suppressor is chosen for a specific use case, and I don’t know enough to see that (diminishing returns for length/weight?)
I tried asking chatgpt, but it just returned generic suppressor info.
There are ways to stop any gas from escaping the barrel, meaning complete silencing of that noise. For example, captive piston ammo, which I bet someone has developed into a captive piston suppressor to let the bullet accelerate longer.
Mechanical and bullet flying noises will remain.