@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 month agomy gleeby deeby asslemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square18fedilinkarrow-up1485arrow-down15
arrow-up1480arrow-down1imagemy gleeby deeby asslemmy.blahaj.zone@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 month agomessage-square18fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish9•1 month agoI’m not actually, just that a binary integer that overflows at 60 couldn’t exist, hence the 5.907 whatever bit length
minus-squarejackeryjoolinkEnglish5•1 month agooh, that’s actually clever. And I’m saying that as a software engineer. I missed that possibility :)
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•1 month agoI should have phrased it differently, like “Ah yes, the well known 5.9068905956 bit integer.” But thanks
I’m not actually, just that a binary integer that overflows at 60 couldn’t exist, hence the 5.907 whatever bit length
oh, that’s actually clever. And I’m saying that as a software engineer. I missed that possibility :)
I should have phrased it differently, like “Ah yes, the well known 5.9068905956 bit integer.” But thanks