@[email protected] to [email protected] • 4 days agomy gleeby deeby asslemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up1476arrow-down15
arrow-up1471arrow-down1imagemy gleeby deeby asslemmy.blahaj.zone@[email protected] to [email protected] • 4 days agomessage-square17fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish8•3 days agoI’m not actually, just that a binary integer that overflows at 60 couldn’t exist, hence the 5.907 whatever bit length
minus-square@TyfudlinkEnglish5•3 days agooh, that’s actually clever. And I’m saying that as a software engineer. I missed that possibility :)
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•3 days agoI should have phrased it differently, like “Ah yes, the well known 5.9068905956 bit integer.” But thanks
I’m not actually, just that a binary integer that overflows at 60 couldn’t exist, hence the 5.907 whatever bit length
oh, that’s actually clever. And I’m saying that as a software engineer. I missed that possibility :)
I should have phrased it differently, like “Ah yes, the well known 5.9068905956 bit integer.” But thanks