• blanketswithsmallpox
    link
    fedilink
    9
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    sadreality

    to be fair records only go back like 200 years tho but it is still telling about the direction

    Yes… that is how records work lol…

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          The original toot clarified that they were talking about direct measurements only (but evidence exists that this is the warmest period in the last 125,000 years).

          • Glitchington
            link
            131 year ago

            Ah yes, approximation is not a record therefore we cannot consider it a factor at all, regardless of it being our best estimate given our current data. You’re right, let’s throw it all out and opt for ignorance. 🙄

              • Glitchington
                link
                71 year ago

                No you’re acting like we can’t use this as a data point when it’s the data we have. It may not align apples to apples, but we have a recognizable trend that aligns with/exceeds predictions. I don’t see the point in doubting the data we have.

              • @Donjuanme
                link
                61 year ago

                I’m sure we would take ice samples from the modern era, ya know if any new ice was being deposited. Other systems are pretty easy to correlate 1:1.

                Just because something isn’t digital doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist or we can’t take observations from it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        This Wikipedia page honestly has some of the best climate change graphics I’ve seen anywhere. They’re simple, fact-based, concise and paint a pretty obvious and telling picture.