• @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        The original toot clarified that they were talking about direct measurements only (but evidence exists that this is the warmest period in the last 125,000 years).

        • Glitchington
          link
          131 year ago

          Ah yes, approximation is not a record therefore we cannot consider it a factor at all, regardless of it being our best estimate given our current data. You’re right, let’s throw it all out and opt for ignorance. 🙄

            • Glitchington
              link
              71 year ago

              No you’re acting like we can’t use this as a data point when it’s the data we have. It may not align apples to apples, but we have a recognizable trend that aligns with/exceeds predictions. I don’t see the point in doubting the data we have.

            • @Donjuanme
              link
              61 year ago

              I’m sure we would take ice samples from the modern era, ya know if any new ice was being deposited. Other systems are pretty easy to correlate 1:1.

              Just because something isn’t digital doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist or we can’t take observations from it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      This Wikipedia page honestly has some of the best climate change graphics I’ve seen anywhere. They’re simple, fact-based, concise and paint a pretty obvious and telling picture.