Summary

Donald Trump suggested using “economic force” to acquire Canada, citing trade deficits and national security benefits.

He also claimed the U.S. “subsidizes” Canada by up to $200 billion annually.

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau dismissed the idea, saying, “there isn’t a snowball’s chance in hell” Canada would join the U.S.

Meanwhile, U.S. President Joe Biden praised Trudeau’s leadership as he prepares to leave office amidst rising U.S.-Canada trade tensions and tariff threats under Trump.

  • @Cryan24
    link
    English
    511 day ago

    Doesn’t seem wise,the US depended on Canada for 60% of its crude oil last year…

    • @vanderbilt
      link
      English
      121 day ago

      Now you see why he’s trying to normalize the idea of annexation. Greenland has potential to be resource rich and Canada is resource rich.

      I predict the next world war will happen on the cusp of smaller nations creating nuclear arsenals to defend their sovereignty.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 day ago

        By “resource rich” I assume you mean “One of the few habitable places on earth in 20 years.”

        • @DicJacobus
          link
          English
          121 hours ago

          Most of Canada isn’t even habitable for weird Canadians. I live close to Maine, and there are some times of the year where you arne’t leaving home for a day or two until the snowplows dig everyone out. and our winters are MILD

    • @givesomefucks
      link
      English
      211 day ago

      Yeah. But Canada was dumb enough to build pipelines into America instead of their own refineries or shipping, so they’re kind of stuck.

      And Trudeau is resigning and while I don’t know much about his likely replacement…

      He doesn’t seem great

        • @errer
          link
          English
          31 day ago

          And then Canada sells this unprocessed oil to…who exactly? Gotta get it to a coast if you can’t pipe it through the US and Canada is yuge

          • palordrolap
            link
            fedilink
            21 day ago

            Oil doesn’t go off if you store it properly. Or don’t extract it in the first place. The fact it has been in the ground for millions of years is testament to that.

            And, there’s that whole Putin thing I alluded to. Europe might well be interested in surplus oil.

            Yeah, we should be using renewables, not fossil fuels, but a lot of the old infrastructure is still here. There’s bound to be some interest.

            I do feel for the oil workers who might be affected by all this, though, which might be what you’re getting at.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              7 hours ago

              Oil (EDIT: in the ground) is stored under a lot of pressure, oil wells cannot be shut off and restarted easily, some might never start again when being shut off, building refineries and pipelines takes years and storing large swaths of crude above ground is incredibly inefficient.

              In the end you need a good processing and logistics to get the stuff on the market constantly.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 day ago

        Why cant Canada introduce legislation to Stop providing cruse oil through those Pipeline? Starting from Trumps Inauguration or at least from the start of the next contract renewal. Would be one hell of a Inauguration present

      • @Cryan24
        link
        English
        81 day ago

        Or they cut you off and you dont have the oil to mobilise your army against them…

    • @Magister
      link
      English
      21 day ago

      And aluminium, and wood