• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    123 hours ago

    The thing is, gesturing vaguely at something (…) obvious, is not really a source

    Yeah, it’s not like there’s a lot of people honestly and precisely detailing how they developed their bigoted attitudes. That doesn’t mean that you can’t reason your way to a logical conclusion, though.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        123 hours ago

        No, this (ascertaining the underlying causes of bigotry) is a place where definitive data by definition can’t exist and thus logically reaching the most probable conclusion based on what IS known must take its place.

        I’m trying to assume that your demands for the impossible are in good faith, but it’s getting difficult .

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          019 hours ago

          As I said before, claiming data can’t exist is a lazy cope-out. I also presented an example of data that could work: antisemitic attacks per day vs activity of Israel in Gaza, plotted over time. Just an example, I’m no sociologist.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            19 hours ago

            As I said before, claiming data can’t exist is a lazy cope-out

            As far as bad faith reading goes, ignoring the word “definitive” to make your strawman fit is up there 🙄

            antisemitic attacks per day vs activity of Israel in Gaza, plotted over time. Just an example, I’m no sociologist.

            Nobody ever told you the difference between correlation and causation or the fact that bigotry consists of SO much more than just overt violence, did they?

            It’s clear that nothing good will come from continuing to indulge you, so I’m gonna go now. Have the day you deserve.