Hello, IT. Have you tried turning it off and on again?

  • @raspberriesareyummy
    link
    5
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    “Since words can be represented in binary, thus as a sequence of ones and zeroes, […], doesn’t that mean that all questions can be answered by saying no, then yes again at some level?”

    How has no one pointed out yet that this is conceptually wrong? Turning something off & on again is cycling the same switch. Solutions to IT problems are setting different bits, which is binary for “using different words”.

    • Get_Off_My_WLANOP
      link
      fedilink
      615 hours ago

      How dare you use logic on my computer logic-related shower thought.

      But yeah, I get what you mean. I had that thought at some point after posting. This is why I should probably just keep it in this silly thread and not write any philosophy essays soon.

    • @Zorque
      link
      English
      114 hours ago

      I mean, technically speaking, it’s cycling all the switches. You use one main switch to simplify the process, but it controls all the other switches as well.

      • @raspberriesareyummy
        link
        113 hours ago

        No, that’s the whole misconception here. cycling a switch means returning to the previous state. Turning it off and on again means going from ON -> OFF -> ON. Software problems are solved by going from one state to a different state.