• Friendly reminder that

      1. there is no official/real definition of open source
      2. the definition you probably mean is hillariously silly. There’s one project that is pretty big and well-receifed in the community but isn’t open source according to them because it contains the paragraph “don’t do evil” in its license.

      So yeah, take that how you want.

      • @theunknownmuncher
        link
        0
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        Huh? Open source has a definition. It means the source is accessible and one can build the software themself. I think you might be mixing up open source and FOSS (which does have to do with licenses).

    • JackGreenEarth
      link
      fedilink
      English
      217 hours ago

      You’re right, I shouldn’t have implied it was fully open source