• Friendly reminder that

    1. there is no official/real definition of open source
    2. the definition you probably mean is hillariously silly. There’s one project that is pretty big and well-receifed in the community but isn’t open source according to them because it contains the paragraph “don’t do evil” in its license.

    So yeah, take that how you want.

    • @theunknownmuncher
      link
      0
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      Huh? Open source has a definition. It means the source is accessible and one can build the software themself. I think you might be mixing up open source and FOSS (which does have to do with licenses).