• @evidences
    link
    English
    122 months ago

    I think that’s more about Iran wanting uranium and not so much Canada’s nuclear weapons program.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 months ago

        What? It only takes time and effort and a few hundred million dollars of non-tampered machinery.

        • @marcos
          link
          English
          3
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          You need a reasonably capable semiconductor industry or partnership with somebody that has one.

          I do think Iran has both of those, but I’m not an expert. Anyway, they had a major setback once because they were relying on electronics trafficked from Germany.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            That’s not how stuxnet works. I’m not a tanky by any means. I’m an American and we had to hire a swedish operative to infiltrate their closed Gap systems and insert a rubber ducky. The problem wasn’t that the machinery came from Germany. The problem was we paid off a swedish guy to rape the software.

            https://youtu.be/UtFqtA0X_hM

            • @marcos
              link
              English
              22 months ago

              Do you think Chinese military ADCs are vulnerable to Windows 0-day attacks?

              People would have a much harder time if Iran had a proper sourcing of their equipment.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                2
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                You realize there are several root escalation zero day exploits for all versions of the Linux kernal from that time period right?