• @ghurab
    link
    English
    315 days ago

    and Baathist Syria was totally a democratic republic

    • @FlowVoid
      link
      English
      2
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      I don’t believe Syria ever styled itself “Democratic”. But the Syrian Republic was certainly a republic.

      For that matter, so was the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.

      A republic is simply a nation with no monarch. If you don’t believe me ask any Canadian, as they are constantly debating whether to officially leave the British crown and become a republic.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        315 days ago

        Yea, the name is originally in latin res publica, meaning “public matter”. In opposition to a kingdom that is the private domain of a single person.

      • @ghurab
        link
        English
        114 days ago

        Not as a title, but if i recall correctly, the first first article of the old constitution states that the Syrian Arab Republic is a Democracy. Also for what it’s worth, the Baath party was also officially “socialist”.

        The lack of a monarchy isn’t enough to qualify as a republic, the people need to also hold some sort of power.

        • @FlowVoid
          link
          English
          114 days ago

          Being a republic has nothing to do with whether ordinary people hold power. For example in Plato’s Republic, power was exclusively held by philosophers because ordinary people were unwise and could not be trusted.