On our own instance no less lmao

Inb4 YoU CaN jUsT bLOcK uSsSSs

    • @Rhoeri
      link
      English
      171 month ago

      I’ve seen people banned with “liberal” being the reason.

      • FundMECFS
        link
        fedilink
        8
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I mean, at the limit, if they were clear in their rules that only radical leftists are allowed (which you would assume given it’s called ML - marxist leninism) it might be acceptable.

        The genocide denial and masquerading as a neutral all purpose instance isn’t though.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -41 month ago

      Fallacy fallacy: only because it contains a fallacy (or a bunch) the argument isn’t necessarily void.

      Still stacking fallacies isn’t usually a sign of a good and or valid argument.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -71 month ago

          Moving the goalpost fallacy. You wrote in your comment to which I replied that no argument can be made against pointing out that someone’s arguments contains fallacies, which is not true.

          I wasn’t present as you got hurt arguing on the Internet so I couldn’t anticipate that you were up against someone who’s “entire identity was based on logical fallacies” (ad hominem).

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -81 month ago

              Would you be so kind as to point out the straw man in that?

              And no I don’t think you are necessarily wrong, I think you apply your standards selectively.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -111 month ago

      Nice set of logical fallacies in this comment, and I don’t see any citations supporting your anecdote.