Even though that piece of information can be verified by other credible sources (like NBC News). This is a news post they personally didn’t like.
This is not the first time this particular mod, who has self-proclaimed to “hate biggotry” but seems to be more about “love censorship”, has done something similar.
They seems bothered by the source of the article, not the content. I know you reposted it from NBC and that’s still up, from which site did you post the article when it was taken down?
I didn’t post the original, but it seemed fine to me:
That remains to be seen, I’ve posted it after I posted the info here, so only a few minutes.
I had nothing to do with the original post, except that I added some comments on the post and saw the same mod show their disagreements by continuing the discussion in a modlog note thus making it impossible for me to reply.
Never heard of ndtv.
You did kinda go off on an anti religious rant in the comments which is kinda weird, but I don’t think it’s power tripping as long as the NBC article stays up.
NDTV is rightwing Indian propaganda, which is why the people mad it’s not accepted as a legitimate source also repeat the anti Muslim propaganda.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/ndtv/
It’s like trump supporters and Faux News in America.
Doesn’t seem weird to me. It’s a law allowing pedophilia in a country run by people who belong to a religion that was founded by a pedophile.
now do the Christianity please…
Their anti-abortion policies are just so that the women they rape can’t “kill” their kids. They wouldn’t have to worry about that if they just stuck to altar boys.
thank you daddy!
just preempting “iTs RayCISm” crowd…
Neither did I. The removal was kinda obviously in response to the comments by me which the mod already deleted and then they had to have their final say in the modlog reason for removal. But well, if you don’t see it as power tripping, nothing I can do.
Maybe I’m missing something, but why not just directly post the NBC article rather than the NDTV?
Well, I didn’t post the original article.
Ah, that’s what I missed!