People who have never been to L.A. really have no idea how insanely huge it is. Driving to my apartment from the start of city (before you even get to L.A. county) and having the city just keep going and going and going for two hours and not because of traffic jams is something you have to experience to truly understand.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    151 month ago

    that’s exactly why it’s addicted to cars, correct….
    there is a decent light rail system connected all the cities in socal, but the buses suck

    • @Anticorp
      link
      English
      31 month ago

      Being able to travel from one city to another doesn’t mean anything if you’re not able to get to where you need to go within that city. These are not small, walkable cities.

        • @Anticorp
          link
          English
          -41 month ago

          The phrasing is what bothers me. Saying they have an addiction makes it sound like they’re abusing something they don’t need, when in fact you do need a car if you’re going to live in Los Angeles. It’s like comparing food to cocaine, they’re not equivalent.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            111 month ago

            Building your city so that you can’t survive without a car is what a city having a car addiction means.

          • Max
            link
            English
            71 month ago

            I think the idea is that the larger society/city/culture is addicted, not the individual people

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            You’re being shat on for something SO FAR beyond your control and they’re just not understanding… well they understand, but they’re disingenuous in their arguments.