People who have never been to L.A. really have no idea how insanely huge it is. Driving to my apartment from the start of city (before you even get to L.A. county) and having the city just keep going and going and going for two hours and not because of traffic jams is something you have to experience to truly understand.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    99 hours ago

    that’s exactly why it’s addicted to cars, correct….
    there is a decent light rail system connected all the cities in socal, but the buses suck

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
      link
      English
      59 hours ago

      Being able to travel from one city to another doesn’t mean anything if you’re not able to get to where you need to go within that city. These are not small, walkable cities.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        No one said they were and no one disagrees with this. What’s your point? He literally said the trains between cities are good and the buses suck.

        • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
          link
          English
          -18 hours ago

          The phrasing is what bothers me. Saying they have an addiction makes it sound like they’re abusing something they don’t need, when in fact you do need a car if you’re going to live in Los Angeles. It’s like comparing food to cocaine, they’re not equivalent.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 hours ago

            Building your city so that you can’t survive without a car is what a city having a car addiction means.

          • Max
            link
            English
            44 hours ago

            I think the idea is that the larger society/city/culture is addicted, not the individual people