@[email protected] to [email protected] • edit-21 month agorulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square166fedilinkarrow-up1929arrow-down130file-text
arrow-up1899arrow-down1imagerulelemmy.blahaj.zone@[email protected] to [email protected] • edit-21 month agomessage-square166fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@Aqariuslink5•1 month agoThat’s under the assumption that you’re actually getting them to a doctor and not just slapping the bandaid on and calling it a day.
minus-square@TheDoozerlink6•edit-21 month agoAnd I would argue that in either case, stopping the bleeding is still the immediate goal.
minus-square@Aqariuslink7•1 month agoAnd would be correct. But if we’re planning a health system, and I keep insisting on bandaids but refuse to even talk about anything else, my proposal is a bait-and-switch. That’s the problem, not UBI/NIT, as a concept.
That’s under the assumption that you’re actually getting them to a doctor and not just slapping the bandaid on and calling it a day.
And I would argue that in either case, stopping the bleeding is still the immediate goal.
And would be correct. But if we’re planning a health system, and I keep insisting on bandaids but refuse to even talk about anything else, my proposal is a bait-and-switch. That’s the problem, not UBI/NIT, as a concept.