“He called for the death of Hitler, what a bad guy”
“Wow he bullied a trans kid into killing themselves and spread misinformation so an entire community came out to attack an immigrant, what an outstanding member of society”
A problem is that hegemony is constantly calling for violence without any restraint. For example Genocide Joe regularly talked about his support for genocide in palestine. There were zero repercussions.
When “calls for violence” are restricted, we’ll still hear calls for violence from those who violently enforce that restriction.
Joe has been selling/givibg weapons to israel and calling for them to excercise restraint. He hasnt been calling for israel to kill all the Palestinians in fact he has been calling for ceasefire.
He hasnt taken any actions to stop israel nor has he called for them to do more. All he has done is maintain the status quo.
Give me free speach or give me death.
And by free speach i mean the right to say any speach that is not explicitly calling for actionable violence
You had 3 opportunities to spell “speech” correctly and chose not to.
Removed by mod
I mean, it does sort of discredit your argument when you have to actively ignore your spellchecker to make it.
Disgusting.
I’d take a call for killing a ceo over transphobia any day.
So u think that some hateful words are worse than the literal death of another human.
If that human is responsible for a large number of deaths?
Yes. Hateful words are far worse. I wouldn’t celebrate hateful words.
I think hate speech is worse than self defence. Yes.
Don’t argue with these people. They advocate actual death upon people they don’t like, but won’t allow you to call them a bad name.
“He called for the death of Hitler, what a bad guy”
“Wow he bullied a trans kid into killing themselves and spread misinformation so an entire community came out to attack an immigrant, what an outstanding member of society”
Don’t listen to yourself champ.
You don’t have free speAch if you don’t have speech.
A problem is that hegemony is constantly calling for violence without any restraint. For example Genocide Joe regularly talked about his support for genocide in palestine. There were zero repercussions.
When “calls for violence” are restricted, we’ll still hear calls for violence from those who violently enforce that restriction.
Joe has been selling/givibg weapons to israel and calling for them to excercise restraint. He hasnt been calling for israel to kill all the Palestinians in fact he has been calling for ceasefire.
He hasnt taken any actions to stop israel nor has he called for them to do more. All he has done is maintain the status quo.