Summary

President Joe Biden highlighted his administration’s economic record, citing consistent job growth and a 2.7% inflation rate drop from its 2022 peak.

December’s jobs report showed 256,000 new jobs and declining unemployment, signaling steady economic growth.

However, inflation remains above the Federal Reserve’s 2% target, and interest rates remain high, impacting homebuyers and businesses.

Public pessimism lingers on affordability as Biden passes a largely strong economy to his successor, Donald Trump.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32 days ago

    Proof?

    Did Garland ever lay charges for sedition? The evidence was right on TV for the entire global population to watch live…

    • @UsernameHere
      link
      02 days ago

      So you don’t have any proof of your conspiracy theory?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 days ago

        Proof of what? That Trump led an insurrection, and Garland did nothing about it, except talking about some day doing something about it?

        • @UsernameHere
          link
          12 days ago

          Garland started multiple investigations. And did all the things necessary to prosecute a President. Trump delayed that prosecution using his judges.

          Then you claim Garland didn’t start the investigations or try to prosecute Trump. And you blame Trumps enemies for Trumps actions.

            • @UsernameHere
              link
              02 days ago

              What exactly are you referring to that was publically broadcasted?

              Because the argument that Trump used was that he didn’t incite the insurrection and that the people who stormed the capital acted on their own.

              So to prosecute Trump, the DOJ had to prove beyond doubt that Trump intentionally incited the insurrection.

              Not prove it to you or me. But prove it to a Judge appointed by Trump.

              While managing the thousands of cases and investigations against the insurrectionists.

              Proving intent beyond a doubt to a Trump appointed judge would require hard evidence and could still be ruled in favor of Trump by the judge he appointed.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 days ago

                What exactly are you referring to that was publically broadcasted?

                The literal insurrection that happened, at his prompting…

                Because the argument that Trump used was that he didn’t incite the insurrection and that the people who stormed the capital acted on their own.

                Almost all of the folks convicted stated otherwise.

                So to prosecute Trump, the DOJ had to prove beyond doubt that Trump intentionally incited the insurrection.

                Doesn’t sound any more difficult than a nationwide manhunt for someone who defended our nation against a mass murderer… And they seemed to be able to get that wrapped up pretty quickly.

                Not prove it to you or me. But prove it to a Judge appointed by Trump.

                I would have loved, had they tried. Garland, however, did not want to launch a case against a fellow neocon.

                While managing the thousands of cases and investigations against the insurrectionists

                It must suck to be the AG… Or, perhaps, Biden should have appointed someone up tot he task. Meanwhile, they were investigating thousands of insurrectionists, convicted a bunch, who all stated they were following Trump’s orders.|

                Proving intent beyond a doubt to a Trump appointed judge would require hard evidence and could still be ruled in favor of Trump by the judge he appointed.

                Yes, I would have LOVED to see him even try to do so… However, he did not want to sic the hounds on a neocon darling like Trump.

                • @UsernameHere
                  link
                  12 days ago

                  Almost all of the folks convicted stated otherwise.

                  Their statements don’t prove Trumps intent in court. Especially to a judge who favors Trump.

                  Doesn’t sound any more difficult than a nationwide manhunt for someone who defended our nation against a mass murderer… And they seemed to be able to get that wrapped up pretty quickly.

                  Luigi wasn’t the president. I’m surprised that needs to be explained to you.

                  I would have loved, had they tried. Garland, however, did not want to launch a case against a fellow neocon.

                  They did try. Trump blocked the case using his judge. This is the part you’re ignoring for your conspiracy theory.

                  It must suck to be the AG… Or, perhaps, Biden should have appointed someone up tot he task. Meanwhile, they were investigating thousands of insurrectionists, convicted a bunch, who all stated they were following Trump’s orders.

                  He was up to the task. Trump blocked the case using his judge. This is the part you’re ignoring for your conspiracy theory.

                  The other insurrectionists didn’t own any judges to block their cases until they became president again.

                  Yes, I would have LOVED to see him even try to do so… However, he did not want to sic the hounds on a neocon darling like Trump.

                  They tried to prosecute. Trump blocked the case using his judge. This is the part you’re ignoring for your conspiracy theory.