A trade group for the adult entertainment industry will appear at the Supreme Court on Wednesday in its challenge to a Texas law that requires pornography sites to verify the age of their users before providing access – for example, by requiring a government-issued identification. The law applies to any website whose content is one-third or more “harmful to minors” – a definition that the challengers say would include most sexually suggestive content, from nude modeling to romance novels and R-rated movies.

  • Nougat
    link
    fedilink
    1061 day ago

    The law applies to any website whose content is one-third or more “harmful to minors”

    So … Infowars, Fox News, OAN, Answers in Genesis, JW, Texas.gov … right?

    Or, all the porn sites should just put huge amounts of public domain works and open source repositories on their sites, so that less than one-third is “harmful to minors.”

    • @BrianTheeBiscuiteer
      link
      English
      619 hours ago

      Pretty much every social media site would probably count too.

    • @ZILtoid1991
      link
      English
      341 day ago

      They’re the arbiters of what is “harmful to minors”.

      • @Passerby6497
        link
        English
        2224 hours ago

        Well yeah, they’re experts in hurting children.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        101 day ago

        Yeah, they would just say that those public domain works or open source repositories teach minors undesirable knowledge of some sort or compete with commercial software vendors and/or entertainment providers.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          824 hours ago

          That can be weaponized, though. US government publications are public domain. So is the Bible. We’d at least get to watch members of the Texas government tie themselves into knots worthy of a game of Twister as they try to argue that those texts are harmful on a porn site but not anywhere else.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            424 hours ago

            Who says that they would argue that they are not harmful anywhere else? Remember, the bible used to be only read by priests in Latin and interpreted to the masses and many governments would love to have less transparency as you can see in their opposition to freedom of information type initiatives.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              223 hours ago

              It isn’t in their best interests to threaten the loony Christian sects that are one of the right wing’s favourite brainwashing tools. Members of those sects rely on authority figures to “interpret” the Bible for them instead of actually paying attention to its content, but if you try to take it away from them, they’ll throw a fit like a toddler does when you take away a toy they’ve been ignoring. Restricting access to the Bible in the present day would make religious brainwashing more difficult and create more people who actually think for themselves, which is anathema to bad governments like Texas’.

    • @shalafi
      link
      English
      420 hours ago

      “Flood the zone with bullshit” can work for both sides.

      • @ZILtoid1991
        link
        English
        141 day ago

        4chan will be okay, it hosts /pol/, a nazi board.