• Amju Wolf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2723 hours ago

    The funniest (or saddest?) part of all this is that $15 is considered “low”. It’s still pretty high for something so vital (and tbf I’d much rather see a requirement for like 5-10 Mbps at $5 or so; you don’t need much bandwidth for meaningful, very useful service).

    • @pcr3
      link
      English
      15 hours ago

      It’s crazy how many people equate Mbps latency. Broadband companies spread this lie that faster is better.

      You can game lag free and have VoIP calls with zero interruption on 5Mbps.

      Only thing more Mbps helps with is downloading larger files faster.

      • @mlg
        link
        English
        13 hours ago

        You can game lag free and have VoIP calls with zero interruption on 5Mbps.

        Yeah on like… 2-4 devices total lol.

        What if I want to play MariokartDS online with 8 of my friends on the same connection?

        My WEP router advertises 11 Mbps WiFi, I want to use the whole thing.

        ^/s

      • Phoenixz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Also helps with streaming and many, many other services

        Having said that, though, yeah… 99% of the population doesn’t need more than 10Mbit / person

    • @Squizzy
      link
      English
      413 hours ago

      I understand the argument but there is far less issues and costs associated with fibre connections which are virtually limitless in terms of speed - theoretical limits apply butbwe are still seeing new equipment at either ends that allow for multiple tbps speeds.

    • @nnullzz
      link
      English
      1022 hours ago

      I not disagreeing but $15 would still put it at one of the cheapest if not the cheapest vital service. I’m not sure you could get any other utility for much lower than that.