I did read. In the second response I did try to declare my assumption on what I thought that you ment. I did not mean that you have written it but rather that if you were to write that it would be false. I should have worded it like that: “If you mean is Proton a scum you would be wrong.” I wrote about “scum” not “trump scum” which I see now, to you, the latter means someone supporting Trump. Next time I will just ask what do you mean. I am new to these kind of sites and have rarely if ever posted so please excuse my mistake.
You fell for a sensationalising post.
Is it wrong?
If you mean that Proton is a scum you are writing something that is false. Proton is doing many things that are usefull and right. Should I elaborate?
I didn’t write anything, I just asked if the message about proton’s head supporting Trump was false.
Weird… No response.
I am in a different time zone. It was 3am.
But you still didn’t respond
Check now.
Maybe you should have worded the question like that from the beginning. It is hard to tell what you mean otherwise.
No, you just didnt read. The sequence was
This isn’t confusing or ambiguous.
I did read. In the second response I did try to declare my assumption on what I thought that you ment. I did not mean that you have written it but rather that if you were to write that it would be false. I should have worded it like that: “If you mean is Proton a scum you would be wrong.” I wrote about “scum” not “trump scum” which I see now, to you, the latter means someone supporting Trump. Next time I will just ask what do you mean. I am new to these kind of sites and have rarely if ever posted so please excuse my mistake.