Summary

Americans are posting videos about 3D-printed guns on the Chinese video app RedNote, despite the content being illegal in China.

While some users are uncomfortable with the topic, others see it as an opportunity for cultural exchange.

The future of TikTok remains uncertain as the Supreme Court is expected to rule on the ban.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    271 month ago

    Electro chemical machining can make a barrel.

    But, idk how any of what you said makes them a “meme”. You can buy a barrel online for cheap, also ammo, and I don’t have to go through a government check. That’s what a lot of these people want to avoid.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      251 month ago

      In most countries, the barrel or other pressures bearing parts are the regulated piece. We are the weird ones for regulating receivers instead.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 month ago

        Well, the article references Americans, I’m American, so okay?

        Europeans can also get guns mailed to their front door, are we just comparing gun laws?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          91 month ago

          Europeans can also get guns mailed to their front door, are we just comparing gun laws?

          I mean, there’s a lot of context surrounding licensing and pre-approval to get that mail order heater in Europe. Local laws vary, yadda yadda

          And if you collect old guns and have a C&R license, you too can get guns delivered to your door in America.

          • @RaoulDook
            link
            English
            41 month ago

            In the UK you can also purchase a pistol with bitcoin on the dark web and have it delivered to a train station locker, but that is not legal at all.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            01 month ago

            Oh yeah, 1000%. Also, with a C&R license, you’re not legally purchasing a “firearm”. It’s a curio or relic, but yeah, point still stands.

            Also, none of that has anything to do with the discussion at hand, which was sorta my point.

            • @nerdyshades
              link
              English
              11 month ago

              I have my 03-FFL, and “Curio & Relic” is a classification that firearms can fall into, defined as firearms manufactured 50-years or more ago. Legally, by definition, you are still purchasing a firearm. You’ve just had more background checks to bypass some of the rules in most states about transfers, if the firearm you are buying qualifies as a “Curio & Relic”.

                • @nerdyshades
                  link
                  English
                  11 month ago

                  Reading my comment back makes it sound more dick-ish than I intended, my bad. You just happened to mention a special interest of mine that I know a lot about.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    21 month ago

                    No worries dog. I was also tired of semantic battles at that point and also wasn’t having it, so also came off as a dick. I also have my 07 FFL and SOT, so, trust me, I get it, I was/am wrong. The correction is warranted. Just not at all the conversation I was trying to have lmao

        • @IndustryStandard
          link
          31 month ago

          It mentions sending videos about them to China. Where most of those videos are useless because the parts and ammo are not sold there.

            • @IndustryStandard
              link
              21 month ago

              Okay so a lot of work to create the barrel, but the gun still takes 9mm ammunition. And if someone in China can get their hands on ammo they can get their hands on a gun.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 month ago

                Okay? I don’t know what you’re arguing here? 3D printed guns aren’t a meme. Some don’t require any regulated parts. I don’t care if the average Chinese person can or will get their hands on one. You can just say you didn’t know what you were talking about when you said 3d printed guns are a “meme”. It’s not that deep

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 month ago

      Electro chemical machining can make a barrel.

      Yes, but that’s not 3d printing any more.

      It’s a separate process requiring separate tools, materials and skills.

      • @Jumpingspiderman
        link
        31 month ago

        But you can make anything with that additional process. SO it’s going to be difficult for a government to lock down those additional processes.

        • mycelium underground
          link
          English
          2
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I can make barrels and stuff like that on a milling machine and a lathe. Not just shitty parts but better than most big manufacturers put out. Government can’t control manufacturing.

          Still not 3d printing.

          edit: Typo

    • @IndustryStandard
      link
      01 month ago

      Barrels require rifling. It is fairly difficult to manually create the groove as it requires a lot of tooling. Not impossible. But not something people will do to create a single gun. Only the barrel would be more work than assembling the rest of the gun.

      Purchased ammo and other parts are specific to the US. 3D printed guns give people the illusion that they can make the entire gun using a 3d printer and off the shelf consumer parts. But most 3d printed guns are made by buying all the required metal parts for guns and printing out the exterior.