• @shalafi
    link
    English
    -49 hours ago

    Unanimous?! Makes you wonder what they know that we might not.

    • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Nothing to do with the data collection, the court was ruling on the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act’s constitutionality.

        • @jacksilver
          link
          English
          17 hours ago

          Wasn’t claiming it was a good or bad call, just that the Supreme Court is about legality and there is history of the US banning software and a global history of banning this specific app.

    • @Zak
      link
      English
      6
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Most of them[1] know a whole lot more about constitutional law than the average lemming.

      When things are working correctly, the Supreme Court’s role is usually not very concerned with the facts of the case; its role is to resolve questions of law. Congress considered the facts including some classified briefings, decided that American app stores should be forbidden from distributing TikTok to American users, and made a law. The court was asked whether Congress has the authority to make laws like that, and the court decided that it does.

      [1] Maybe not Clarence Thomas