minus-square@RhoerilinkEnglish5•12 days agoSomething about this felt wrong but I looked it up, and…. Nope. You’re absolutely correct! Damn. I had thought the classics were much faster than that, but a 1964 mustang only topped out at around 100mph.
minus-square@TwentySevenlink3•12 days agoYou picked a car with a small engine (for its time anyway). I don’t think a 64.5 mustang was ever considered a fast car.
minus-squareFartsWithAnAccentlinkfedilink2•12 days agoI’ve done 120 in a basic-ass sedan lol, by modern standards their cars are shitty and slow. Gotta admit, some of them look good though.
Something about this felt wrong but I looked it up, and…. Nope. You’re absolutely correct! Damn. I had thought the classics were much faster than that, but a 1964 mustang only topped out at around 100mph.
You picked a car with a small engine (for its time anyway). I don’t think a 64.5 mustang was ever considered a fast car.
Fair point.
I’ve done 120 in a basic-ass sedan lol, by modern standards their cars are shitty and slow.
Gotta admit, some of them look good though.