Yeah, I think massive chemical batteries for storing excess electricity to facilitate a contrived green energy market is a bad idea.

  • Yggstyle
    link
    English
    10
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    So uh. I guess those coal and natural gas power plants would fare better in a fire. Something seems wrong there but OP clearly wouldn’t possibly post something on the Internet that was utterly detached from reality.

    Energy storage is just that. Fire is frequently quite good at releasing said energy.

    Lithium? poof.

    Oil? yup.

    Nat gas? mmhmm.

    wood? yup.

    Coal? dang.

    Guess all we got left is water - I’m sure that doesn’t have any specific regional requirements…

    So tell us champ: what energy storage you got all figured out from that armchair?

    • @neclimdul
      link
      English
      63 hours ago

      Nuclear though, never had a problem with excess heat at one of those. /s

      • Yggstyle
        link
        English
        12 hours ago

        Was gonna list it but I figured our energy-tzar OP would just complain about radioactive minerals being like batteries with more steps.

      • Yggstyle
        link
        English
        22 hours ago

        Hey! It puts out fires so it’s like… better!