A trade group for the adult entertainment industry will appear at the Supreme Court on Wednesday in its challenge to a Texas law that requires pornography sites to verify the age of their users before providing access – for example, by requiring a government-issued identification. The law applies to any website whose content is one-third or more “harmful to minors” – a definition that the challengers say would include most sexually suggestive content, from nude modeling to romance novels and R-rated movies.
No it didn’t. It stated they had to give them to the court.
No, I’m asking you to show me where it says personally-identifiable information, such as names, are fine for companies to broadcast publicly.
Why can’t you provide this proof?
Grow up. Data protection laws exist. Companies can’t go round posting information about specific users, no matter how much you and your school friends think it would be a funny way to, like, totally own those politicians brooo.
Because they aren’t private.
Name alone is not in itself pii but membership specifically is not private unless it’s in their privacy policy.
Because that’s not how the law works bud.
Awesome, point to one that says membership rolls are protected. You can’t find a law and you can’t be original, why am I not surprised.