They didn’t say “invented”. They said “used by”. The idea that whole grains are better for you doesn’t hold up under scrutiny. They might even be worse for you, because they’re harder to digest. So, it is, in fact, a term used by capitalists to deceive you.
Which term isn’t used by “capitalists” to deceive you?
Most “capitalist” products here use refined grain. Almost no brand uses whole grain. For comparable products, the price of whole grain vs refined is basically the same.
They didn’t say “invented”. They said “used by”. The idea that whole grains are better for you doesn’t hold up under scrutiny. They might even be worse for you, because they’re harder to digest. So, it is, in fact, a term used by capitalists to deceive you.
I searched for studies about while gains and can only find some claiming benefits, like https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9777732/, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5310957/ and https://www.bmj.com/content/353/bmj.i2716 (I searched for “whole grain study” to not bring a bias into it). The effect of fiber in diet is generally seen as positive as being easily digestible isn’t the only metric. Raw sugar can be digested really easily, yet a diet consisting solely if it is usually not suggested or recommended.
Which term isn’t used by “capitalists” to deceive you?
Most “capitalist” products here use refined grain. Almost no brand uses whole grain. For comparable products, the price of whole grain vs refined is basically the same.