Yeah, I think massive chemical batteries for storing excess electricity to facilitate a contrived green energy market is a bad idea.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    013 hours ago

    We can all agree on that, Clearly li-ion is a bad choice for static use cases.

    But right now it’s the cheapest option, and it looks likely that will stay true for quite a while unfortunately.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      112 hours ago

      It’s the densest option. The cheapest is probably salt/water or iron/water using scrap

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        16 hours ago

        LIthium Iron Phosphate is cheapest relatively dense battery type. Sodium ion will be if lithium get expensive.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        012 hours ago

        Weirdly it’s not, except maybe gravity batteries where nice reservoirs happen to exist already. It should be but it’s not right now.

        Li-ion has economy of scale right now. I do think molten metal etc will overtake eventually, but they’re currently playing catchup and li-ion has dropped in price so much over time that it’s surprisingly cheap even where it should make no sense.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            138 minutes ago

            Dams are a normally a power supply rather than a battery. I was more thinking pumped storage hydro. Which is usually done where theres 2 lakes next to each other at very different heights, so you can “store” power by pumping water up and release by pumping back down.