Novo Nordisk is a healthcare company and all carbon capture is bullshit. In this case, they’re capturing the carbon by using a ton of energy, releasing methane and creating a different carbon-based fuel.
Andrew Wakefield had academic bonafides and and worked for the Wellcome Trust. He was also full of shit.
The fact that the technology works does not mean it’s a good idea to use it.
As always. The most efficient way to capture carbon is to never dig it up in the first place.
Carbon capture is an action of desperation and would only possibly make sense if we were already fully transitioned to renewable energy. It’s all bullshit unless we’re stuffing the carbon back in the ground and even in that case it’s unlikely it’ll ever make sense.
The Novo Nordisk Foundation is a charity which owns a holding company with a majority stake in Novo Nordisk the pharma company.
Anyway, my whole point was that arguments to authority (these researchers published this, so don’t question it) are not valid. You’ve used them against people challenging research papers for which you agree with the conclusions.
I never said anything about the scientists who did this at all. I never even said this doesn’t work as described.
The bullshit part is that this is some sort of way out of global warming and a way to develop sustainable green fuel and I’m not sure why that isn’t clear to you.
Novo Nordisk is a healthcare company and all carbon capture is bullshit. In this case, they’re capturing the carbon by using a ton of energy, releasing methane and creating a different carbon-based fuel.
Andrew Wakefield had academic bonafides and and worked for the Wellcome Trust. He was also full of shit.
The fact that the technology works does not mean it’s a good idea to use it.
As always. The most efficient way to capture carbon is to never dig it up in the first place.
Carbon capture is an action of desperation and would only possibly make sense if we were already fully transitioned to renewable energy. It’s all bullshit unless we’re stuffing the carbon back in the ground and even in that case it’s unlikely it’ll ever make sense.
The Novo Nordisk Foundation is a charity which owns a holding company with a majority stake in Novo Nordisk the pharma company.
Anyway, my whole point was that arguments to authority (these researchers published this, so don’t question it) are not valid. You’ve used them against people challenging research papers for which you agree with the conclusions.
I never said anything about the scientists who did this at all. I never even said this doesn’t work as described.
The bullshit part is that this is some sort of way out of global warming and a way to develop sustainable green fuel and I’m not sure why that isn’t clear to you.