You’d think a hegemony with a 100-years tradition of upkeeping democracy against major non-democratic players, would have some mechanism that would prevent itself from throwing down it’s key ideology.

Is it really that the president is all that decides about the future of democracy itself? Is 53 out of 100 senate seats really enough to make country fall into authoritarian regime? Is the army really not constitutionally obliged to step in and save the day?

I’d never think that, of all places, American democracy would be the most volatile.

  • @angrystego
    link
    151 month ago

    Are you ready for some tearing up and redoing of constitution now?

    • @Fredselfish
      link
      71 month ago

      No, I’m ready for something else though are you?

      • @angrystego
        link
        101 month ago

        I’m flattered, but I’m not in the mood right now. I’ll be in my corner worrying about constitution redoings…

    • @tamal3
      link
      11 month ago

      Let’s go crowd sourced, a la Iceland. That truly opened my eyes to the political possibilities in the Internet age… If only big corps didn’t make all the decisions.

    • @Soggy
      link
      English
      11 month ago

      Sure, you’d end up with at least two countries because many states would just refuse to join the new republic.