• Skeezix
    link
    English
    2211 days ago

    Trump just made billions on his shit coin, got all his cases thrown out or nullified, and he’s already won 2nd term. So maybe he doesn’t care about the pee tape anymore.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      710 days ago

      Given the potato quality such a tape would be, if it exists, he could claim its AI, and it would be extremely difficult to prove him wrong.

      Also, I think supporting Ukraine is actually quite popular with his support base.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      6
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      I’m guessing it involves underage girls. Because the threats he make here are completely meaningless and toothless.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        810 days ago

        I don’t think his supporters would actually care about that. Child marriage is legal in 37 US states.

        The guy is a convicted rapist and an Epstein client. People don’t care.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          310 days ago

          It’s quite possible they wouldn’t, but I suspect it would depend on the age of the underage girls. I wouldn’t be surprised if they were under the minimum age in all those 37 states. And of course, he didn’t marry them.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            310 days ago

            The marriage thing just turns an ethical / moral / health matter into a legal one. If they were really against sex with minors, they’d be against child marriage. But they aren’t, so this is just another way to be outraged at something where they feel there will be no repercussions because the target group is rightfully frowned upon.

            Anyhow, if such a tape exists, he could just claim everyone said the girls were over 18; and if they weren’t, maybe the tapes were produced somewhere where sex between them is legal? Remember, all pearl clutching and rule of law talk from them is hollow, this is just “we can do whatever we want and you have to do what we want” behavior, thinly disguised.

            You’re trying to apply your logic and values to the whole thing; it doesn’t work because there’s retroactively applied justification at best.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              110 days ago

              Again, it depends how young they are, there’s a limit to how far you can push the “they were all 18” argument.

              • borari
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                8 days ago

                Trump: They were all at least 18.

                Everyone: bro they’re obv not even teenagers.

                Trump: “oh you meant 18 years…”