It’s quite possible they wouldn’t, but I suspect it would depend on the age of the underage girls. I wouldn’t be surprised if they were under the minimum age in all those 37 states. And of course, he didn’t marry them.
The marriage thing just turns an ethical / moral / health matter into a legal one. If they were really against sex with minors, they’d be against child marriage. But they aren’t, so this is just another way to be outraged at something where they feel there will be no repercussions because the target group is rightfully frowned upon.
Anyhow, if such a tape exists, he could just claim everyone said the girls were over 18; and if they weren’t, maybe the tapes were produced somewhere where sex between them is legal? Remember, all pearl clutching and rule of law talk from them is hollow, this is just “we can do whatever we want and you have to do what we want” behavior, thinly disguised.
You’re trying to apply your logic and values to the whole thing; it doesn’t work because there’s retroactively applied justification at best.
I’m guessing it involves underage girls. Because the threats he make here are completely meaningless and toothless.
I don’t think his supporters would actually care about that. Child marriage is legal in 37 US states.
The guy is a convicted rapist and an Epstein client. People don’t care.
It’s quite possible they wouldn’t, but I suspect it would depend on the age of the underage girls. I wouldn’t be surprised if they were under the minimum age in all those 37 states. And of course, he didn’t marry them.
The marriage thing just turns an ethical / moral / health matter into a legal one. If they were really against sex with minors, they’d be against child marriage. But they aren’t, so this is just another way to be outraged at something where they feel there will be no repercussions because the target group is rightfully frowned upon.
Anyhow, if such a tape exists, he could just claim everyone said the girls were over 18; and if they weren’t, maybe the tapes were produced somewhere where sex between them is legal? Remember, all pearl clutching and rule of law talk from them is hollow, this is just “we can do whatever we want and you have to do what we want” behavior, thinly disguised.
You’re trying to apply your logic and values to the whole thing; it doesn’t work because there’s retroactively applied justification at best.
Again, it depends how young they are, there’s a limit to how far you can push the “they were all 18” argument.
Trump: They were all at least 18.
Everyone: bro they’re obv not even teenagers.
Trump: “oh you meant 18 years…”