@[email protected] to World [email protected] • 13 hours agoRussia rejects idea of NATO peacekeepers in Ukraine, warning of "uncontrollable escalation"www.reuters.comexternal-linkmessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up136arrow-down10
arrow-up136arrow-down1external-linkRussia rejects idea of NATO peacekeepers in Ukraine, warning of "uncontrollable escalation"www.reuters.com@[email protected] to World [email protected] • 13 hours agomessage-square6fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-10•edit-29 hours agoUkraine is not (yet?) NATO either, so why send troops there? Wouldn’t sending troops actually just escalate things further and drag the whole of NATO into it if anything were to happen to those soldiers?
minus-square@Pilferjinxlink7•edit-26 hours agoUkraine needs a guaranteed security measure to prevent Russia from attacking again. It’s a stop gap to a more permanent solution. Either NATO membership or Nukes.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-1•1 hour agoPerhaps Russia wouldn’t attack if it wasn’t provoked.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•7 hours agoWhy not both? Call the nukes a welcome to NATO bonus.
Ukraine is not Russia. Eat shit.
Ukraine is not (yet?) NATO either, so why send troops there?
Wouldn’t sending troops actually just escalate things further and drag the whole of NATO into it if anything were to happen to those soldiers?
Ukraine needs a guaranteed security measure to prevent Russia from attacking again. It’s a stop gap to a more permanent solution. Either NATO membership or Nukes.
Perhaps Russia wouldn’t attack if it wasn’t provoked.
Why not both? Call the nukes a welcome to NATO bonus.
Peacekeepers keep the peace silly boy.