cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/24646745

Is it weird that I see nothing objectionable about this one? Looks solid to me, other than bypassing a Senate vote.

There has to be some Monkey’s Paw here somewhere, but I’m not immediately seeing it.

  • @WhereGrapesMayRule
    link
    241 day ago

    He argued in federal court today that members of native American tribes are not citizens.

      • @jordanlundOPM
        link
        171 day ago

        Part of the birthright citizenship executive order:

        https://www.salon.com/2025/01/23/excluding-indians-admin-questions-native-americans-birthright-citizenship-in/

        The Justice Department then goes on to cite the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which predates the 14th Amendment by two years. The Justice Department attorneys specifically cite a section of the act that notes that  “all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States.”

        The Trump administration then goes on to argue that the 14th Amendment’s language — the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” — is best understood “to exclude the same individuals who were excluded by the Act —i.e., those who are ‘subject to any foreign power’ and ‘Indians not taxed.’”

        The Justice Department attorneys return to the topic of whether or not Native Americans should be entitled to birthright citizenship later in their arguments, citing a Supreme Court case, Elk v. Wilkins, in which the court decided that “because members of Indian tribes owe ‘immediate allegiance’ to their tribes, they are not ‘subject to the jurisdiction’ of the United States and are not constitutionally entitled to Citizenship.”

        • Radioactive Butthole
          link
          fedilink
          English
          101 day ago

          Oh well that explains it then. By recognizing this tribe federally I bet he is tryng to revoke their citizenship so he can kill them later.

          • Rhaedas
            link
            fedilink
            724 hours ago

            Follow the money. There has to be some profit downstream. Otherwise this would be a blanket recognizing for all tribes in the US. Maybe some quid pro quo for some resource, with the threat of removing the status if they don’t comply?

            • @jordanlundOPM
              link
              323 hours ago

              It was to win North Carolina, of course now that he got the votes, he wants to block them from ever voting again.

              • Rhaedas
                link
                fedilink
                223 hours ago

                The promise was to get the votes, but to grant that promise suggests more to it.

        • @jj4211
          link
          324 hours ago

          But at this point, that should be moot either way, they are being born to people that have been recognized at citizens and nothing in the order seems to claim to be retroactive, and as far as I’ve seen, they only are claiming changes for children of non citizens.

          While he’s chock full of malice and corruption, I’m thinking that this one is potentially innocuous in nature. It’s not like every single thing must have a catch, though I certainly appreciate folks looking out for what those catches are… He did promise the Lumbee tribe recognition and they have long actively sought that recognition, so this would seem to be a strangely straightforward move in a sea of weirdness.