I have one outstanding order that is already out for delivery. Once I get that, I’m closing my amazon account. I’m done. Buy nothing. Vote with your wallet. Edit: account is closed. get bent Bozos.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -242 days ago

    Deleting LGBTQ policies is nothing compared to the slow drum of global warming that might wipe us out as a species.

    I tried to save y’all by advocating for third parties, who would actually bring in the same level of EO you’re seeing from Trump but instead to focus on education, military cuts, and moving towards green and nuclear

    • madjo
      link
      fedilink
      262 days ago

      Voting third party in a two party horse race is a fool’s errand. Especially if you voted for known Putin stooge Jill Stein, who was only running to steal away votes from Kamala Harris. She knew she didn’t stand a chance at winning.

      • @dx1
        link
        -12
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Voting “third” party only fails because the great mass of fucking morons who insist on voting for the genocidal, global empire terrorist pieces of shit currently in charge. You can try as hard as you want to deflect that blame, but it will never wash off.

        • ObliviousEnlightenment
          link
          013 hours ago

          Well, those morons genuinely support those things. A quarter of voters is not winning an FTTP election

        • @Doomsider
          link
          162 days ago

          I like your sentiment, but a two party system inherently uses third party votes as spoilers. It is common for the dominate party to support a third party to peel away votes from their major opposition.

          https://youtu.be/s7tWHJfhiyo?si=6y_K1yvlvDPNxm70

          One solution to this is ranked voting. Of course many of our politicians recognize this and have already passed laws at the state level to bar ranked voting under the pretense that it is too confusing for voters.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 days ago

            Nailed it - I’ll consider a 3rd party vote on equal-footing once we have ranked/ranked choice voting in place. Right now, I think there’s a higher probability for one of the two parties to consider this so in other words… it’s going to be a while…

            • @Doomsider
              link
              11 day ago

              Whatever party is in power has a lot to lose from ranked voting and nothing to gain. This will make this reform very hard to pass. I live in Alaska and we have ranked voting that narrowly avoided a repeal this last year after passing the previous year.

          • @dx1
            link
            1
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            There is no legal enshrinement of a “two party system”. Whoever the public votes for wins. The public’s self-defeating mentality is the problem.

            • @Eldritch
              link
              English
              12 days ago

              Not explicitly. Just effectively. Between first past the post, which naturally evolves into a two party system. And the electoral college which enshrines it. At the national level actual, independent 3rd parties are an impossibility. And they know it.

              Theoretically matter could spontaneously coalesce into a Boltzmann brain before a 3rd party could win a national election.

              • NSRXN
                link
                fedilink
                01 day ago

                first past the post, which naturally evolves into a two party system

                this isn’t true.

              • @dx1
                link
                0
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                FPTP doesn’t naturally evolve into a two-party system. Cultural predispositions cause that. The electoral college does not enshrine it, it - sometimes - hands the elector votes to the majority winner of the state, and some states even have legal pledges to follow other systems. There is no impossibility. I will repeat myself for the fiftieth time in this thread, THE PUBLIC’S SELF-DEFEATING MENTALITY IS THE PROBLEM. The public TELLS ITSELF a third party is an impossibility, the public DOESN’T VOTE FOR A THIRD PARTY. You will resign yourselves to slavery until you figure this out.

                • @Eldritch
                  link
                  English
                  22 days ago

                  Duvegers law and people who actually study poly sci disagree. And I’m more inclined to believe someone with evidence and proof over someone like yourself. Who has nothing, spouting magical thinking BS.

                  • NSRXN
                    link
                    fedilink
                    01 day ago

                    duverger’s law is no law, at all. it’s an undisprovable tautology.

                  • @dx1
                    link
                    0
                    edit-2
                    2 days ago

                    “Duverger’s Law” (you misspelled it) is a principle, not some deterministic physical law. I studied polisci at college, thanks. Read your own link. First sentence - “TEND to emerge”. Not “always emerge”. There’s an entire section in the article named “Exceptions”. One of those exceptions is IN the U.S. Learn the difference between “tendencies” and “absolutely certain physical laws”, this is basic logic/math.

                    This kind of sloppy thinking is so common in the U.S., I swear to god, this is exactly what I’m talking about with the shitty education system kneecapping the democracy.

        • @BadmanDan
          link
          42 days ago

          What’s the point of voting for a 3rd party when they have no members in Congress or the courts? They’d have to coalition with Republicans or Democrats anyways.

          • @nieminen
            link
            62 days ago

            Exactly, it’s not like the president has all power (at least not yet, we’ll see where it is in a couple years). Without supporting members of the other branches, a third party president is nearly useless. That said, I’d take a useless but well meaning president over Trump.

            • @dx1
              link
              -2
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              ^ This speaks to a lack of civics education. Without an overwhelming majority, Congress can’t pass harmful legislation with an executive veto, and the executive can still halt its implementation.

          • @dx1
            link
            -1
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Gridlock is better than streamlined totalitarianism. Vote for them in both. And courts weren’t really partisan before ~2010.

        • @jumjummy
          link
          -21 day ago

          Voting third party this election directly lead to a Trump win. “You can try as hard as you want to deflect that blame, but it will never wash off.”

          • NSRXN
            link
            fedilink
            21 day ago

            if everyone who voted for a so-called third party had voted for the democrat, trump still would have won.

          • @dx1
            link
            11 day ago

            Only in terms of “but this would have happened if you voted for something else”, the logic of which equally applies to the sum of Harris voters voting for somebody who, simultaneously, (a) had substantially less votes in the final outcome, but also (b) was so extremely evil that they’re complicit in a genocide. Or is that too hard for you to wrap your head around.

        • madjo
          link
          fedilink
          12 days ago

          With a “First Past The Post, Winner Takes All”-system like you have in the US, there’s virtually no chance of a third party winning an election, as the majority of the country haven’t even heard of your candidate, and thus won’t vote for it.

          And then still, once you get your third party elected president, then what? They’ll have to make huge compromises on their campaign promises in order to get anything done in Congress.

          • @dx1
            link
            -12 days ago

            The public choosing to vote for a different party wins in a FPTP system regardless. The obstacle is the public.

    • @jumjummy
      link
      21 day ago

      You’re a fool then. Voting for a third party has the exact same effect as not voting, and in this election, that effect was also supporting Trump. Get your head out of the fantasyland.

      People like you are part of the problem.