• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    You don’t just “have many redundant wives”. It starts out roughly 50/50 from birth no matter what you do.

    You either have more women by having a lot of single men, or a lot of dead men, or by taking women from other places.

    • @chonglibloodsport
      link
      English
      116 days ago

      Yes I mentioned that earlier in the thread. Polygyny = some men have many wives, others have none.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        116 days ago

        Which does nothing to help with the issue of mothers dying from pregnancy, unless there’s something more that you know?

        • @chonglibloodsport
          link
          English
          116 days ago

          Multiple wives => redundant wives. Solves the issue of mothers dying in pregnancy. The more wives you have, the more you expect to survive to be able to care for the children. Having only one wife, on the other hand, means all your eggs are in one basket (apologies)!

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            116 days ago

            There is no such thing as redundant wives in a total sense.

            There’s only kidnapped wives, or dead or single men. That’s the only way you get a relative surplus. The amount of women remains the same whether you do polygyny or not.

            • @chonglibloodsport
              link
              English
              116 days ago

              I’m sure there’s some kidnapped wives historically. Some wives bought from their fathers. But there’s also plenty of women who have consented to marry a man who already has a lot of wives. The issue has to do with resources and political power.

              A rich and powerful man has a lot of resources available for his wives and children. A poor and weak man has few or none. Your chances of escaping starvation and death are much higher with the rich and powerful man.

              Notice that I made zero mention of love. Marriage for love is a luxury of modernity, of wealth and power overflowing. You didn’t marry for love in the days when a bad year meant there was no food to last through winter.